There are numerous examples of why learning Sign Language, in conjunction with CIs, can lead to better educational and social outcomes. This bilingual approach is similar to spoken language bilingualism, in that the benefits are more likely with early acquisition of the first (visual) language.
![]() |
| Early exposure to signing can often lead to better overall language outcomes (both spoken and signed). |
Sign language can give children a strong first language foundation which is usually acquired more naturally, which can then be used for further instruction; their first language allows more effective instruction in a second language, and has the ability to improve general academic outcomes. The benefits of teaching babies to sign early are mirrored in the popularity and positive results seen with the Baby Sign trend used with hearing children.We can also consider international models of Deaf education and socialisation, which have seen positive results.
![]() |
| An Auckland Deaf Club social event, one of the many events where the Deaf Community gathers to connect and socialise. |
We can also consider the role of bilingualism and community in mitigating mental health issues. As suggested by previous research, deaf people (not necessarily involved with the Deaf community) are at a higher risk of mental health issues, including depression. Other research has suggested that depression can be linked to isolation from a community and a feeling of shame (perhaps, the kind felt by children who grow up feeling that deafness needs to be 'fixed'), and that emotional wellbeing in Deaf children is often linked to forming a positive Deaf identity.



I'm glad you included Baby Sign. It's frustrating that it hardly gets a mention (if at all) in many articles about the benefits of bilingualism, never mind d/Deaf bilingualism. I'm not a fan or a detractor of the trend -- I tend to instinctively avoid anything that's "in" -- but we shouldn't ignore something that catches on like that. It must have some effect to become so popular and the implications for communication theory, linguistics, brain development, etc. must be of interest.
ReplyDeleteFrom your statement "...children exposed to signing..." do I take it that some Deaf parents have allowed their Deaf children to have cochlear implants though?
I agree, Baby Sign adds yet more weight to the existing evidence that learning to sign is beneficial for a baby's overall language development. I'm sure that those who are anti-bilingualism would argue that it works for hearing children because they have the access to speech simultaneous to signing, but it doesn't change the fact that there are numerous other research examples which support its use for deaf children as well (I'm never really sure whether to use deaf or Deaf when referring to children since their membership in the Deaf community is so hard to determine without knowing their circumstances). If I wasn't restricted by the word count I would have mentioned the potential opposition to Baby Sign results, but there's only so much you can include within 1000 words!
DeleteYes, that statement and the following statement are in relation to the previous statement about research regarding children who signed or did not sign while waiting for a CI operation. Again, not something I can go into more detail with, but this supports our (as in, yours and mine) anecdotal experience that many Deaf people are much less extremist in their view of CIs than they used to be...providing a CI is not a 'replacement' for signing and forming a Deaf identity.
Thanks for your comments!
Hi Julia
ReplyDeleteI'm a bit braindead by this stage of lab, but a definition for AVT would be helpful - I couldn't find one in your previous posts?
No, you're not braindead, you're actually very onto it! I thought I'd included a link to this but obviously I missed it off in the process of going through various websites.
DeleteThanks for the tip, I've included a link in my previous post now. :)