Receiving a CI is not a 'miracle solution' to deafness, and CI outcomes vary substantially between individuals. Discouraging Sign Language or failing to present the option impartially removes a tool which can lead to greater academic and social opportunities and membership in a supportive community.
While the choice to learn Sign Language should be just that - an individual choice - when people are not fully informed about their options they are denied the chance of the best possible outcomes in life. Since many parents must make the decision on behalf of their infants, we are even more ethically bound to ensure they have all the information before they do so.
The bilingualism approach strongly indicates better outcomes. Doesn't everybody have the right to the best life they can get?
Total word count: 1137
Woohoo! I'm reading your posts in reverse and this is a great summary that makes your stand extremely clear. Nice use of firm, yet cautionary, language. I also like your wallpaper and graphics.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jenette! I'm glad that at the end of it all it's come out in a way which makes sense to people.
DeleteHahah, yeah I'm a fan of images!
Where's the Like button on this Blogger thing?
ReplyDeleteHahah, thanks Ana!
DeleteOmg i like your background picture. Shows the passion you have for your topic. hehe after reading your blog Julia i believe that sign language is a very important tool and if removed,it would disable alot of people from attaining their dreams and pathways :)
ReplyDeleteHi Pretisha,
DeleteThanks, I'm glad that you found my blog interesting and convincing!
Julia